Home Discussions Questions & Answers Granular Item Cost Review for Make and Buy Items

Granular Item Cost Review for Make and Buy Items

Avatar photoCustomer January 11, 2021 at 8:43 am

We need a detailed cost report showing costs for both buy and make items. Ideally, it should let us compare the detail cost structure between two different cost types (e.g., Frozen vs. Pending).

Viewing 6 reply threads
  • Author
    Replies
    • Support January 12, 2021 at 2:25 pm  

      The CAC Item Cost & Routing report is what you need. It shows detailed item costs for buy and make items and allows comparison of any two cost types, providing a row-by-row comparison in detail.

    • Avatar photoCustomer January 13, 2021 at 2:02 pm  

      How can I restrict the output just to items that are configured to be rolled up, and exclude items where costs are manually maintained?

    • Support January 14, 2021 at 5:20 am  

      Use the ‘Based on Rollup’ optional parameter. Enter ‘Yes’ to get the rolled up items, or ‘No’ to retrieve non-rolled-up (manually maintained) items. You can also filter by ‘Make or Buy’ status.

    • Avatar photoCustomer January 15, 2021 at 9:22 pm  

      If I am auditing specific cost components, such as ‘Lot’ costs or ‘Total Value’ basis types, can I filter for those?

    • Support January 16, 2021 at 4:57 am  

      Yes, you can use the optional ‘Basis Type’ parameter to filter for specific basis types such as Item, Lot, Res Units, Res Value, or Ttl Value. Note that a bug fix was applied to this report to remove the ‘Cost Type 2’ parameter, relying instead on the Multiple Value functionality for the ‘Cost Type’ parameter for comparisons.

    • Avatar photoCustomer January 18, 2021 at 7:45 am  

      Which parameter is mandatory for defining the cost type being reported?

    • Support January 19, 2021 at 1:20 am  

      The ‘Cost Type’ parameter is mandatory and accepts one or more cost types you wish to report.

Viewing 6 reply threads
  • You must be logged in to reply to this post.

Login with: